Maxwell's equations can be formulated (assuming unit speed of light):
- \dot B + \nabla\times E = 0
- \dot E - \nabla\times B = - J
- \dot\rho + \nabla\cdot J =0,
- J =\sigma (E + v\times B),
where \sigma is a conductivity and v the velocity of the conducting medium. The dot indicates differentiation with respect to time t, while x is a Euclidean space coordinate.
Differentiating 2 with respect to time and applying \nabla\times to 1, gives the following wave equation for the electric field:
- \ddot E + \nabla\times\nabla\times E = - \dot J,
where for a time constant charge density \rho moving with velocity v, \dot J =\rho\dot v.
In the electrostatic case, Maxwell's equations reduce to:
- \nabla\cdot E (x) = \rho (x) and E(x)=\nabla\phi (x) with \phi (x) potential,
- that is \Delta\phi (x) =\rho (x).
There are two possible ways of viewing Maxwell's equations in terms of input and output:
- (I) Input: charge and current, Output: electric and magnetic fields,
- (II) Input: electric and magnetic fields, Output: charge and current.
Here (I) corresponds to solving wave equations with \rho and J given input producing as output E and B as action at distance with a time delay because of finite speed of light, or the static Poisson equation with potential \phi (x) as output by action at distance from \rho (x) without time delay aspect.
Further (II) correspond to instantaneous local action by electric/magnetic fields to produce \dot J(x.t) or \rho (x). This is the physical process of electromagnetic induction.
In electromagnetics, both cases appear, with an example of (II) given in the above picture.
Maxwell's equations are Galilean invariant modulo a second order factor \frac{v^2}{c^2} with c the speed of light, see Many Minds Relativity Chapter 17. The speed difference between human observers can differ by at most a few km/s, while c\approx 300.000\, km/s, and thus the factor is smaller than 10^{-10}. Maxwell's equations can thus in practice be viewed by human observers to be Galilean invariant, which makes Lorentz invariance irrelevant.
Maxwell's equations are Galilean invariant modulo a second order factor \frac{v^2}{c^2} with c the speed of light, see Many Minds Relativity Chapter 17. The speed difference between human observers can differ by at most a few km/s, while c\approx 300.000\, km/s, and thus the factor is smaller than 10^{-10}. Maxwell's equations can thus in practice be viewed by human observers to be Galilean invariant, which makes Lorentz invariance irrelevant.
I am truly impressed by how you have revealed the inconsistency of modern irrational physics. I really think you are right. I find it strange, however, that no physicists have defended the prevailing theory of relativity and the Standard Model. I searched for “evidence” that photon particles exist and found the following by Ass. Prof. Chad Orzel:
SvaraRaderahttp://scienceblogs.com/principles/2010/08/05/whats-a-photon-and-how-do-we-k/
Refering in particular to the book The Quantum Challenge by Greenstein and Zajonc , and writing:
…it is generally agreed that the experiment that absolutely nails the existence of photons is the photon anti-bunching experiment by Kimble, Dagenais, and Mandel in 1977 (more than 70 years after Einstein’s paper explaining the photoelectric effect in terms of photons).
I wonder if you have any comments to this “evidence” by Kimble et al. that photons exist?