With the announcement today of the 2017 Nobel Prize in Physics:
- "for decisive contributions to the LIGO detector and the observation of gravitational waves"
- On 14 September 2015, the universe’s gravitational waves were observed for the very first time. The waves, which were predicted by Albert Einstein a hundred years ago, came from a collision between two black holes. It took 1.3 billion years for the waves to arrive at the LIGO detector in the USA.
- The signal was extremely weak when it reached Earth, but is already promising a revolution in astrophysics. Gravitational waves are an entirely new way of observing the most violent events in space and testing the limits of our knowledge.
I cannot refrain from recalling my earlier posts on this issue posing some serious questions: How is it possible to connect a largest possible cause (collision/merger of two black holes) to a smallest possible effect (measurement with precision of the thickness of a hair on a distance of 4 light years) according to Einstein's equations which are not understood and cannot be solved, and as an inverse problem draw conclusion about the very big cause from the very small effect? Compare with these questions. See also this detailed criticism. And this analysis with comment here. Also this.
If gravitational waves exist as "ripples in the fabric of space-time", whatever that means, why are they so incredibly tiny? And if they now are so incredibly tiny, what importance do they carry? Can they really be used as carriers of specific information?
LIGO is an example of Big Physics in the sense of Building a Biggest Possible Detector for detection of a Smallest Possible Effect from a Biggest Possible Cause.
Of course, if you build a Biggest Detector like LIGO in search of Smallest Possible Effect, it is only a question of time before you discover Some Small Effect.
But how can you go from there to a Unique Big Cause?
To me it seems to require a mathematical model of infinite precision, and what says that Einstein's (unsolvable) equations carry that precision?
In any case, I remain skeptical until more evidence is presented. Here is the story we are supposed to buy. Is this real physics, or is it fake physics?
In Advanced Information (about LIGO) we further read:
- Gravitational waves are travelling ripples in space-time.
- A passing gravitational wave is expected to distort space-time through the effects of strain in a very specific way, predicted by the general theory of relativity.
- It is easy to reproduce these results qualitatively without detailed calculations using the full power of general relativity.
- The most likely interpretation for this evolution is the inspiral of two orbiting massive bodies, while emitting gravitational radiation.
We see several caveats: "ripples of space.time", "predicted by the general theory", "it is easy...without detailed calculation using the full power...", "the most likely"...
As soon as you hear "it is easy" concerning a mathematical equation, you should be on your guard...since usually it means the opposite...





