WEP is thus a postulate of GR, while WEP is a consequence of NM. While it is meaningful to test the validity of a postulate, it is not meaningful to use a successful such test to confirm a theory based on the postulate. If we take 1+1=2 as postulate of our favourite pet theory, we cannot say that we have confirmed our theory by verifying that 1+1=2 (as postulate).
Since WEP is a consequence/prediction of NM, it is meaningful to test it like Galilo did to give evidence that NM is correct.
But a successful test of WEP does not confirm GR, since WEP is a postulate of GR and not prediction.
Modern physics is strange.
Inga kommentarer:
Skicka en kommentar