The basic model of global climate, used by e.g. Spencer and Lindzen to determine climate sensitivity, takes the form
- C dT/dt = F(t) - lambda T(t),
where T(t) is some zonal temperature over some period of time t, F(t) is forcing, C is a constant heat capacity and lambda is a positive constant. Here climate sensitivity S = 1/lambda measures the change of temperature per unit change of forcing. The model underlies the recent Spencer-Braswell paper causing an uproar among climate alarmists.
The model can be used to determine S by fitting the model to measurements of T(t) and F(t) over time. If S is small then climate is not sensitive to changes in forcing e.g. from increased CO2.
To understand the dependence of S on characteristics of data (amplitudes and phase lag), assume F(t) = cos(t) with corresponding solution
- T(t) = A (lambda cos (t) + C sin(t)), where A = 1/(C^2 + lambda^2).
We see that the phase lag is determined by the quotient lambda/C:
- small lambda/C: phase lag 1/4 period = large phase lag
- large lambda/C: small phase lag
- lambda/C = 1: phase lag 1/8 period.
Let us now consider two specific cases: (i) diurnal and (ii) yearly variation of some zonal temperature T(t) under varying insolation F(t).
Diurnal:
- variation of F(t) = 200 W/m2 (from day to night)
- variation of T(t) = 10 C
- phase lag = 3 hours (max temp at 3 pm)
- C = lambda > 10
Yearly:
- variation of F(t) = 150 W/m2 (from Summer to Winther)
- variation of T(t) = 15 C
- phase lage = 1.5 month (max temp mid August)
- lambda > C > 10.
In both cases we find a climate sensitivity S < 0.1. We find that the value S =1 by IPCC is a factor 10 too big.
There is massive data duplicating the above and there is thus massive data indicating that:
- the global warming from doubled CO2 of 3-4 C by IPCC, is a factor 10 too big.
Note that climate has a natural variability over day and night and over the year under large variations of the insolation-forcing, which can be used to assess climate sensitivity with respect to small CO2 forcing.
Something is wrong with your Stockholm warmest ever and coolest ever temperatures particularly July. There is no way you could have 91C as the warmest. I think people would expire at that temperature. You should be able to get temperature data from KNMI Explorer.
SvaraRaderaOh! Oh! Just thought the temperatures could be in degree F but that should not be for Stockholm. I am used to C or K.
SvaraRadera