The Myth of an Atmosphere Greenhouse Effect

There are at least two scientists denying the basic postulate of climate alarmism dQ = 4 dT: Gerhard Gerlach and Ralf Tscheuschner, who in Falsification of the Atmospheric CO2 Greenhouse Effect, give massive evidence that this postulate is incorrect:

• There is no atmospheric greenhouse effect, in particular CO2-greenhouse effect, in theoretical physics and engineering thermodynamics.
  

I agree completely, based on my experience as applied and computational mathematician. So we are three. See Temperature Sensitivity of a Basic Climate Model.

RealClimate presents a few weak "rebuttals" of Gerlach/Tscheuschner, very weak, just words. 

But Royal Societies and Academies of Sciences keep quiet, and in doing so support a postulate of climate alarmism,  which cannot be motivated by any known form of physics and thermodynamics.

How is this possible? Is it a consequence of the collapse of rational science from the crisis

of classical physics in the late 19th and early 20th century, out of which emerged relativity

theory and quantum mechanics? 

Probably. The result today is a physics of 11 dimensions in parallel universes totally beyond any rationale and human understanding in which anything is possible, even an Atmospheric Greenhouse Effect without verifiable physics basis. But is it so clever to build society on non-physical non-rational myths presented as rational physics, even if supported by scientific academies?