Sweden Declares War with Russia

Prime ministers Kristersson/Sweden and Zelensky/Ukraine have agreed on delivery of 150 Swedish JAS Gripen fighter jets to Ukraine with possible financing from frozen Russian assets:

• Zelensky: These are very cool planes, powerful aviation platforms that allow for performing a wide range of tasks.
• Kristersson: This will strengthen both Ukraine, Sweden and Europe.

The deal is bilateral between Sweden and Ukraine and means that Sweden effectively declares war with Russia even if not yet officially. Russia has not yet reacted.

Gustaf IV Adolf King of Sweden lost the Finnish War 1808-1809 against the Russian Empire and also his crown and so was deported to exile in Switzerland where he lived in a small hotel in great loneliness and indigence under the name of Colonel Gustafsson.

This meant the end Sweden as European Superpower and the politics shifted from war to peace for 200 years, but the dream of a revanche vs Russia has been kept alive. Sweden is today the NATO country with most aggressive standpoint vs Russia backed by 150 JAS Gripen payed with Russian money.

In this situation it is necessary to answer some questions:

• Are the prospects of winning over Russia better today than in 1808? 
• Will Russia invade Sweden if Sweden does not send 150 JAS to a NATO proxywar in Ukraine against Russia?  
• How will Russia respond to 150 Swedish JAS flying against Russian border? 
• What is the military power of Russia?
• Is Ukraine a member of the defence organisation NATO?

Swedish Parliament has now delegated the decision to Prime Minister Kristersson to send Swedish soldiers to any action outside Sweden deemed necessary to protect Sweden from invasion by Russia. 

There is one member in the Swedish Parliament who supports peaceful co-existence with Russia instead of a war which cannot be won: Elsa Widding without party. 

All political parties speaks about war, while the the moral elite of Sweden once a self-proclaimed humanitarian Superpower is silent including peace/church organisations. Possible to understand?

Compare with earlier analysis:

•  A Logical Analysis of Swedish Foreign Policy

Here we come!