onsdag 13 oktober 2010

The Royals Brooding Difficult Questions

The Scientific Panel of The Royal Academy Seminar on Climate Simulation are still brooding over how to respond to the written questions asked to be posed before the seminar, none of which was answered during the seminar. Meanwhile The Royal Academy gives its own report of the most successful and very well attended seminar under the title Complex Nature Tricks Even the Best Climate Models:
  • Global warming is inevitable.
  • But how much warmer present climate models cannot tell.
  • Professors Lennart Bengtsson and Helge Drange, both experts on different aspects of climate modeling, are sure that the climate is getting warmer, even if the models are deficient.
  • The computations are risk analyses and not prognoses, says Bengtsson.
  • In Sweden there will be no serious problem, although politicians have wanted it that way. The question is too complex for them, says Bengtsson.
Lennart Bengtsson is clever and main responsible for the statement by the Royal Academy in support of IPCC. Bengtsson says two things:
  • It will get warmer, for sure. Funding of IPCC climate alarmism must continue.
  • We don't know at all if it will get warmer, because the science is lacking.
But what will be his answers to the questions? The World is waiting...

1 kommentar:

  1. Ett mycket typiskt Bengtsson citat, en mer slingrik snok får men leta efter. Dessvärre kan man notera att även C-G Ribbing och Pehr Björnbom börjat slänga sig med liknande löjeväckande uttalanden:

    "Växthuseffekten är oomtvistad, den sakliga diskussionen borde gälla dess storlek"

    Vad är egentligen växthuseffekten? Det faktum att en och annan IR-stråle faller ner från himlen? Ingenstans i termodynamiken ges strålningen en sådan särställning.

    Gå istället tillbaks till laboratoriet och mät skillnaden i värmeledningskoefficient för luft med 200 pesp 400 ppm koldioxid och rapportera om ni observerar någon skillnad.

    SvaraRadera