Visar inlägg med etikett lindzen. Visa alla inlägg
Visar inlägg med etikett lindzen. Visa alla inlägg
tisdag 27 mars 2012

Summary of Debate on the Greenhouse Effect

›
Here is a summary of the recent debate about the existence or non-existence of a physical phenomenon named "greenhouse effect", i...
8 kommentarer:
söndag 25 mars 2012

Why Skeptics Need a "Greenhouse Effect"

›
The Basic Postulate of CO2 alarmism is the existence of no-feedback climate sensitivity of global warming of 1 C as the result of a "Gr...
6 kommentarer:
onsdag 21 mars 2012

Why Are Skeptics Attacking Skeptics?

›
My recent sequence of posts describe an attack by the leading skeptics Roy Spencer and Fred Singer on other skeptics under the name "de...
5 kommentarer:
lördag 17 mars 2012

Why Do Skeptics Accept the Basic Dogma of Alarmism?

›
Leading skeptics including Lindzen, Singer, Spencer and Lord M, all adhere to the Basic Dogma of "radiative forcing" of 4 W/m2 fro...

Greenhouse Effect from "Radiative Forcing"

›
The Basic Postulate of CO2 alarmism is a no-feedback climate sensitivity of 1 C as global warming from doubling atmospheric CO2 according to...
1 kommentar:
fredag 16 mars 2012

Richard Lindzen's Greenhouse Effect 2

›
In the previous post we met a bizarre "greenhouse effect" presented by Richard Lindzen in 1997. Maybe this presentation is now ou...
2 kommentarer:
torsdag 15 mars 2012

Lindzen's Bizarre Greenhouse Effect

›
Richard Lindzen describes the greenhouse effect as follows (1997): The most important consequence of the convective heat transport is that...