Recent posts 1+2 in this series with further details in Time to Welcome Newton Back outlines a possible Neo-Newtonian Cosmology based on an expanded form of Newton's Theory of Gravitation with mass of both positive and negative sign with a corresponding gravitational force which is attractive/repulsive for mass of equal/opposite sign, where we happen to live in a visible region of positive mass with only gravitational attraction.
Invisible regions of negative mass would then supply the mysterious dark energy estimated to contribute 70% of the total energy of the visible Universe filling the very large observed voids apparently without positive mass possibly driving the observed expansion of the visible Universe.
The idea of an Anti-Universe to our Universe with all signs switched, with negative mass and anti-protons/electrons et cet, was suggested by Hannes Alfvén, Swedish Nobel Laureate in Physics 1970, in his book Worlds-Anti Worlds: Antimatter in Cosmology 1966.
The possibility of dark energy in the form of negative mass has been proposed by Massimo Melli:
- Most of the substance of the Universe appears to consist of dark energy and dark matter, but until now scientists don't have the faintest idea about their origin and ignore what they are.
- I believe that dark energy and dark matter could consist of tachyons formed during the inflationary phase of the early Big Bang, when time was slow or zero due to the extremely high density of the Universe.
- $\rho = \Delta\phi$ (inverse square law in differential form)
- $\Delta\dot\phi =-\nabla\cdot (\rho u)$ (conservation of mass)
- $\vert\rho\vert\dot u=-\rho\nabla\phi$ (Newton's 2nd Law)
Here $\rho$ is created from $\Delta\phi$ by fast-local-action, changes of $\phi$ in time are created from changes of $\rho u$ in space by slow-global-action (see previous post) and changes of $u$ from gravitational force $-\nabla\phi$ by fast-local-action. We see three concise simple equations in three variables $\phi$, $\rho$ and $u$ describing all of celestial mechanics. Amazing! How can you ever imagine to throw away this mathematical model? Compare this post: Unthinkable that the inverse square law is incorrect.
Inga kommentarer:
Skicka en kommentar