Thermodynamics of War and Peace

Opposing ordered armies at the moment before turbulent destruction. 

The recent posts on 2nd law of thermodynamics describe a process where increasing spatial gradients eventually reach a level (from convection and opposing flow) where further increase is no longer possible because it would bring the process to brutal stop, and so some form of equilibration of spatial differences must set in where 

• each particle tends to take on the mean-value of neighbouring particles.   (M)

This is the process in turbulent fluid flow transforming ordered large scale kinetic energy into small scale disordered kinetic energy taking the form internal heat energy in a turbulent cascade of turbulent dissipation. Here (M) is necessary to avoid break-down into a stop. The flow or show must go on.

(M) is also the essence of the diffusion process of heat conduction seeking to decrease gradients, even if not absolutely necessary as in turbulent fluid flow.

It is natural to connect turbulence to the violent break-down of large scale ordred structures into rubble in a war necessarily resulting from escalation of opposing military forces in direct confrontation which at some level cannot be further escalated and so have to be dissipated in a war. 

It is then natural to connect the equilibration (M) in heat conduction to a geopolitical/parliamentary process in peace time, where each country/party takes on the mean value of neighbouring countries/parties keeping gradients small. 

While (M) is necessary in turbulence to let the flow go on, one may ask what the physics of (M) in the case of heat conduction, and find answer in this post. 

The mathematics is elaborated in: 

• Computational Turbulent Incompressible Flow
• Computational Thermodynamics
• Computational Blackbody Radiation

The geopolitical/parliamentary situation today evolves towards sharpened gradients, while politicians refuse to follow (M) and so there is a steady march towards break-down...