Can you point to a place where it is stated that the Big Bang event is localized in some preexisting space?
To my knowledge you can't backtrack the classical model to the singularity.
Further the Friedman-Robertson-Walker metric isn't solved as an initial problem. You input the isotropical homogeneous background as input in Einsteins equations and the solution is the FRW metric.
This years Nobel price concerns a cosmology that's homogeneous and isotropic on the largest scales, that is consistent with the cosmological principle, doesn't it?
Or where do you mean that the anisotropy takes place?
The Nobel Prize is awarded to the observation that CP without dark energy is not valid. Instead of insisting on dark energy of which nothing is known, it seems to me more rational to give up CP. There cannot be direct evidenece of CP because observations from other points than the Earth are missing.
Can you point to a place where it is stated that the Big Bang event is localized in some preexisting space?
SvaraRaderaTo my knowledge you can't backtrack the classical model to the singularity.
Further the Friedman-Robertson-Walker metric isn't solved as an initial problem. You input the isotropical homogeneous background as input in Einsteins equations and the solution is the FRW metric.
Sincerely,
Dol
Still I cannot see much evidence of homogeneity. Can you?
SvaraRaderaWhat do you mean?
SvaraRaderaAre the empirical large scale observations of a homogeneous mass distribution in the universe wrong?
Please present the measurement that contradicts this.
Sincerely,
Dol
"Further the Friedman-Robertson-Walker metric isn't solved as an initial problem. "
SvaraRaderaI meant of course the FRW-cosmology, not metric, here...
/Dol
The Nobel Prize was awarded for observations showing inhomogeneity.
SvaraRaderaDo you men the price where it was shown that the CMB is extremely homogeneous and only anisotropic on a really small scale?
SvaraRaderaCMB is one thing, mass distribution and velocity another.
SvaraRaderaThen please be more specific what you mean.
SvaraRaderaIsn't the anisotropy connected with the CMB.
This years Nobel price concerns a cosmology that's homogeneous and isotropic on the largest scales, that is consistent with the cosmological principle, doesn't it?
Or where do you mean that the anisotropy takes place?
The Nobel Prize is awarded to the observation that CP without dark energy is not valid. Instead of insisting on dark energy of which nothing is known, it seems to me more rational to give up CP. There cannot be direct evidenece of CP because observations from other points than the Earth are missing.
SvaraRadera