tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1500584444083499721.post389023077578656567..comments2024-03-24T09:28:42.755+01:00Comments on CJ on Mathematics and Science: Response from ECCOMAS General AssemblyClaes Johnsonhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/07411413338950388898noreply@blogger.comBlogger2125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1500584444083499721.post-19466689289955143832014-08-01T11:48:18.424+02:002014-08-01T11:48:18.424+02:00https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=srNTtuTqUBEhttps://www.youtube.com/watch?v=srNTtuTqUBEAnonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1500584444083499721.post-12671376747151615932014-07-24T14:05:38.596+02:002014-07-24T14:05:38.596+02:00I must say that I can not see that the organizatio...I must say that I can not see that the organization has forced you into anything. They on the contrary expresses a wish for you to have accepted the award. Of course, under the procedure that is applicable for this award. You demanded some changes from this protocol, so you have then forced yourself. <br /><br />It is a strange claim that they suppresses an open scientific debate. They wanted to award you based on their (that is according to their protocol) interpretation of your work. They should of course have the final saying in why they wanted to reward you, do you disagree?Anonymousnoreply@blogger.com