tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1500584444083499721.post2187245884297715061..comments2024-03-24T09:28:42.755+01:00Comments on CJ on Mathematics and Science: Einstein's Unphysical? Derivation of the Lorentz TransformationClaes Johnsonhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/07411413338950388898noreply@blogger.comBlogger3125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1500584444083499721.post-69955422343953025652019-12-20T07:25:57.272+01:002019-12-20T07:25:57.272+01:00..SRT is completely erroneous since it is based on.....SRT is completely erroneous since it is based on the wrong kind of transformations: they have lost the scale factor characterizing the Doppler effect. First, Lorentz considered a more general form of transformations (with a scale factor), but then he, and also Poincare and Einstein equated it 1 without proper grounds. Their form was artificially narrowed, the formulas became incorrect. This led to a logical contradiction of the theory, to unsolvable paradoxes. Accordingly, GRT is also incorrect.<br />For more details, see my brochure "Memoir on the Theory of Relativity and Unified Field Theory" (2000): <br />http://vixra.org/abs/1802.0136 Levhttp://lev-verkhovsky.ru/noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1500584444083499721.post-20511872639513106502019-09-03T15:40:49.941+02:002019-09-03T15:40:49.941+02:00To say that L and L' physically are one and th...To say that L and L' physically are one and the same light signal. Claes Johnsonhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/07411413338950388898noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1500584444083499721.post-14781396336208245542019-09-01T19:56:05.991+02:002019-09-01T19:56:05.991+02:00What does it mean to identify L with L'?What does it mean to identify L with L'?Anonymoushttps://www.blogger.com/profile/15275949811392512565noreply@blogger.com