tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1500584444083499721.post8366150403385935526..comments2024-03-24T09:28:42.755+01:00Comments on CJ on Mathematics and Science: Why APS Supports CO2 AlarmismClaes Johnsonhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/07411413338950388898noreply@blogger.comBlogger3125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1500584444083499721.post-83830331988132859742011-10-25T00:22:01.493+02:002011-10-25T00:22:01.493+02:00Claws, you often say that the SB law is obtained b...Claws, you often say that the SB law is obtained by intergrating the Planck law, but originally the SB law was first, 1879-1884. The Planck law came in 1900. If now Planck had the presumption of a background of 0 degrees Kelvin, are you sure that Stefan and Boltzman had the same presumptions? Stefan invented the law experimentally and Boltzmann did it theoretically(before Plancks law was invented)<br />I canĀ“t find anything about 0 deg K as a requirement for the original SB law.Lasse Hhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/11510250462126238787noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1500584444083499721.post-88434958377608917912011-10-21T15:46:54.178+02:002011-10-21T15:46:54.178+02:00Your criticism lacks substance and you show to not...Your criticism lacks substance and you show to not understand SB. Give a proof and you will learn something.Claes Johnsonhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/07411413338950388898noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1500584444083499721.post-80754115975110592912011-10-21T14:45:25.009+02:002011-10-21T14:45:25.009+02:00The argument that you seem to think emerges is a b...The argument that you seem to think emerges is a bizarre parody of the truth, filtered through your own incredible misunderstandings and ignorance. The Stefan-Boltzmann law does not make any reference to a background temperature. The Stefan-Boltzmann law is irrelevant to the concept of radiation from the atmosphere being absorbed by the Earth.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.com