tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1500584444083499721.post27417832592832561..comments2019-11-11T00:08:07.621+01:00Comments on Claes Johnson on Mathematics and Science: More on New View of Motion under GravitationClaes Johnsonhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/07411413338950388898noreply@blogger.comBlogger7125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1500584444083499721.post-68050581702205578012014-03-03T07:05:47.549+01:002014-03-03T07:05:47.549+01:00That is up to you.That is up to you.Claes Johnsonhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/07411413338950388898noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1500584444083499721.post-49804930402469035692014-03-02T23:44:28.816+01:002014-03-02T23:44:28.816+01:00and that is short of a mystery by exactly how much...and that is short of a mystery by exactly how much?lorenzonoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1500584444083499721.post-15131878523967334302014-03-02T19:10:10.555+01:002014-03-02T19:10:10.555+01:00Primordial means given from start as in Big Bang o...Primordial means given from start as in Big Bang or whatever. The Laplacian of the gravitational potential can be viewed as being non-zero as a result of a perturbation of the potential from zero as a form of genesis out of nothing. Claes Johnsonhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/07411413338950388898noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1500584444083499721.post-61955401668709226432014-03-02T18:25:58.140+01:002014-03-02T18:25:58.140+01:00i am not sure i understand what you mean by primor...i am not sure i understand what you mean by primordial. <br />is the potential there without mass?<br />what is the origin of this potential?lorenzonoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1500584444083499721.post-21956961344638419322014-03-02T14:03:36.959+01:002014-03-02T14:03:36.959+01:00You are missing the point which is that the potent...You are missing the point which is that the potential is primordial and mass derived from potential by differentiation acting locally in space.Claes Johnsonhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/07411413338950388898noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1500584444083499721.post-70384067311877124992014-03-02T10:30:56.459+01:002014-03-02T10:30:56.459+01:00i am not sure i am following your line of thought....i am not sure i am following your line of thought.<br />the "mystery" is still there in the equation:<br />ρ(x,t)=Δϕ(x,t)<br />that describe a long range force originating from mass and that you use for deriving your resultlorenzonoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1500584444083499721.post-9707226666355287142014-03-02T04:11:39.701+01:002014-03-02T04:11:39.701+01:00Hi Claes,
Sorry this is a bit off topic, I just ...Hi Claes, <br /><br />Sorry this is a bit off topic, I just came across this paper written in 1930 relating the lapse rate & relativity...<br /><br />The math is way over my head, but thought it would be of interest to you re the lapse rate alone establishing global temperature:<br /><br />http://authors.library.caltech.edu/2574/1/TOLpr30a.pdfMShttps://www.blogger.com/profile/06714540297202434542noreply@blogger.com