tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1500584444083499721.post2319859819102727723..comments2024-03-24T09:28:42.755+01:00Comments on CJ on Mathematics and Science: False SB Not Part of Physics LiteratureClaes Johnsonhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/07411413338950388898noreply@blogger.comBlogger9125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1500584444083499721.post-79613481298106638082011-10-13T23:36:58.137+02:002011-10-13T23:36:58.137+02:00Heat is internal energy in contrast to kinetic ene...Heat is internal energy in contrast to kinetic energy, and heating is increase of<br />internal energy. The first law of thermodynamics states that the total energy as the sum of internal energy and kinetic energy, is conserved.Claes Johnsonhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/07411413338950388898noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1500584444083499721.post-12097138281372588272011-10-13T21:53:28.455+02:002011-10-13T21:53:28.455+02:00Claes,
could you be so kind to define your defini...Claes,<br /><br />could you be so kind to define your definition of heating?Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1500584444083499721.post-36171314482499689702011-10-13T14:50:14.278+02:002011-10-13T14:50:14.278+02:00Direct measurement of IR is trivial. William Hers...Direct measurement of IR is trivial. William Herschel discovered that more than 200 years ago. Your ignorance is staggering.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1500584444083499721.post-59613718044717667752011-10-13T08:38:14.304+02:002011-10-13T08:38:14.304+02:00Yes, direct measurement of IR radiance is difficul...Yes, direct measurement of IR radiance is difficult, or impossible. A telescope,<br />or IR camera, magnifies a light signal which can then be recorded by a sensor by absorption. With enough magnification even a cosmic microwave background radiation at 3K can be recorded and presented in a colored picture. To claim that<br />this background radiation is heating the Earth as a form of DLR lacks scientific rationale.Claes Johnsonhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/07411413338950388898noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1500584444083499721.post-22253585025955561032011-10-13T03:20:28.339+02:002011-10-13T03:20:28.339+02:00Anonym above, it is clear that you have little und...Anonym above, it is clear that you have little understanding of instrumentation. There is no instrument that directly measures radiation or heat flux. Instruments measure directly a voltage or electrical current of a device such as a thermocouple or thermistor which has been (or should have been) calibrated for a relative temperature to some base (ambient) which needs to be measured separately or is assumed. This is then used to calculate with some assumptions (eg an emissivity of 1 for a black body) the radiant heat flux. It is also possible to measure the comparitive intensity of wavelengths of emissions from a source. Making some assumptions from the Planck distribution is possible to calculate a temperature of the source and then from that with further assumption calculate the radiation from the source. If you do not know what you are doing which is the case with most so-called "climate scientist" the it is very likely that assumptions will be wrong and and possibly even get the sign or direction of the heat flux wrong. <br />Have a look at this http://jennifermarohasy.com/2011/02/a-note-on-the-stefan-boltzman-equation/ It may help.<br />cementafriendAnonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1500584444083499721.post-10461748755688762002011-10-13T01:39:17.242+02:002011-10-13T01:39:17.242+02:00"Radiation from stars and galaxies" is c..."Radiation from stars and galaxies" is captured and so in a sense measured by my eyes. <br /><br />But how much does it heat me? <br /><br />-BebbenAnonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1500584444083499721.post-83986998797230097032011-10-12T23:12:11.413+02:002011-10-12T23:12:11.413+02:00Incorrect. It is measured directly. The very sam...Incorrect. It is measured directly. The very same instruments that measure radiation from stars and galaxies measure radiation from the atmosphere. Do you believe that the whole universe is illusory?Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1500584444083499721.post-2210021345050445352011-10-12T22:34:37.070+02:002011-10-12T22:34:37.070+02:00Read about DLR on http://claesjohnson.blogspot.com...Read about DLR on http://claesjohnson.blogspot.com/2011/08/who-invented-downwelling-longwave.html . DLR Radiance is not measured directly, but is computed using a False-SB.Claes Johnsonhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/07411413338950388898noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1500584444083499721.post-21816974231097155292011-10-12T19:06:34.985+02:002011-10-12T19:06:34.985+02:00Simple fact: we observe infrared emission from the...Simple fact: we observe infrared emission from the atmosphere. For example, http://www.gemini.edu/?q=node/10787<br /><br />This simple fact contradicts your hypothesis. To write so much about such a bizarre theory that is so trivially proven wrong is foolish indeed.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.com